agentclaw
Assessment

Fractional Chief AI Officer agency

A fractional Chief AI Officer, backed by the team that builds.

AgentClaw owns AI strategy, prioritization, governance, vendor decisions, adoption, measurement, and delivery.

For non-software companies without an in-house software team in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.

Start the free AI ownership assessmentCheck the fit first

Need and fit

Know when AI needs an owner

The signal is not a missing tool. It is a growing portfolio of AI decisions without one accountable operating owner.

01

Pilots have no owner

Teams can start experiments, but nobody has the authority to rank them, stop them, or move them into production.

02

Vendors are multiplying

Tools are bought one department at a time, with no shared standard for risk, cost, data, or renewal decisions.

03

Results are hard to defend

AI activity is visible. Baselines, adoption, operating cost, and business impact are not recorded in one scorecard.

04

Delivery keeps losing context

A project ships, the project team leaves, and the next decision starts without the roadmap or decision history.

Strict fit

Every condition must be true.

  • A non-software company
  • No employee writes software, firmware, or embedded code
  • Operating in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, or New Zealand
  • A matching monthly or one-off investment

Anti-fit

This is not outsourced product leadership.

We are not a fit for software or software-enabled product companies, companies with an employee writing software, firmware, or embedded code, companies outside the five serviceable countries, companies without matching investment, or rip-and-replace work.

Fit is not based on title, industry, headcount, or revenue.

Accountability

What your fractional CAIO owns

One operating owner keeps business priorities, governance, adoption, measurement, and delivery in the same decision system.

01

Strategy

Turn business priorities into a maintained AI roadmap.

02

Prioritization

Score the backlog and make the stop, start, and sequence calls.

03

Governance

Set decision rights, review gates, data boundaries, and escalation paths.

04

Vendor decisions

Compare buy, build, renew, consolidate, and exit choices.

05

Adoption

Give teams the process, training, and support needed to use what ships.

06

Measurement

Keep a scorecard tied to a baseline, cost, use, and operating result.

07

Delivery

Scope builds and keep implementation connected to the operating plan.

Operating system

A weekly operating cadence, then a 90-day reset

The work is visible before the meeting, decided in the meeting, and recorded after it. The first quarter establishes the loop.

Weekly cadence

  1. 1

    Before the session

    Roadmap, risks, vendor questions, and delivery status are brought current.

  2. 2

    Leadership working session

    Decisions are made with an owner, rationale, due date, and review point.

  3. 3

    After the session

    The decision log and roadmap are updated, then work moves with async support.

  4. 4

    Monthly and quarterly

    The scorecard is reviewed monthly and the portfolio is reset each quarter.

Days 1–30

Establish ownership

  • Inventory active tools and pilots
  • Set decision rights
  • Record baselines and known risks

Days 31–60

Make the portfolio legible

  • Score the backlog
  • Decide vendor and build paths
  • Set governance and measurement gates

Days 61–90

Run the operating loop

  • Advance or retire initiatives
  • Support adoption
  • Review the scorecard and next-quarter roadmap

Engagements

Choose the ownership model

Both main engagements create ongoing executive AI ownership. Delivery capacity is the difference.

01 / Ongoing

CAIO Core

From $5,000/month

Ongoing executive AI ownership for the company and its portfolio.

  • Weekly leadership working session
  • Async decision support
  • Maintained roadmap and decision log
  • Monthly scorecard and quarterly reset
  • Governance, vendor, and budget decisions
  • Builds scoped separately

02 / Ongoing

CAIO + Delivery

From $10,000/month

CAIO Core plus an ongoing delivery pod connected to the roadmap.

  • Everything in CAIO Core
  • One active build stream at a time
  • Delivery decisions stay in the operating record
  • Additional major builds scoped separately
Need a scoped implementation without ongoing executive ownership? A starter build is $1,500 to $2,500 fixed. A production sprint is $5,000 fixed.

Operating artifacts

Capabilities tied to operating artifacts

The service does not stop at advice. Each capability leaves a maintained record that the next decision can use.

Strategy and prioritization

Sample AI roadmap

Initiatives ranked by business value, readiness, risk, and operating cost.

Governance and vendor selection

Sample governance matrix

Decision rights, review gates, data boundaries, and vendor accountability.

Implementation and evaluation

Sample decision log

What was decided, why, who owns it, and when evidence will be reviewed.

Adoption and measurement

Sample monthly scorecard

Baseline, adoption, cost, quality, exceptions, and business result.

See CAIO capabilitiesSee what we build

Evidence

Proof has to survive review

A credible AI operating record separates observed results from estimates and sample artifacts from client evidence.

Label the source

Every baseline, estimate, and result should name its system, period, and owner.

Keep the exceptions

Quality claims include failures, overrides, and the cases that still require a person.

Review business impact

Adoption, cost, cycle time, quality, and business outcome are reviewed together.

The roadmap, decision log, governance matrix, and scorecard shown on this page are illustrative samples, not client results.

Review agent artifactsReview prompt artifacts

Alternatives

Compare ways to own AI

The right model depends on whether the missing need is advice, internal authority, a defined build, or ongoing ownership connected to delivery.

ModelAccountabilityOperating recordDelivery
Fractional CAIOOngoing executive ownerMaintained across the portfolioCore can scope builds; Delivery adds a build stream
ConsultantUsually advisory and time-boundDepends on the engagementOften handed to another team
Full-time hireInternal executive ownerMaintained internallyDepends on the team the company hires
Project agencyOwns a defined scopeUsually ends with the projectBuilt into the engagement
DIY ownershipAssigned to an existing leaderDepends on available timeCoordinated across internal and external resources

Insights

Read the operating notes

Practical guidance for assigning AI ownership, comparing leadership models, and setting the first quarter.

All insights

Operating note

Who owns the AI backlog

Five departments, five pilots, five people certain theirs goes first. Somebody has to hold the single list. Here is who that is, what they are allowed to reject, and how the order actually gets decided.

Read article

Operating note

Fractional AI officer providers, compared

The five pages that own this search never mention each other. So we compiled the list, put ourselves on it, and put ourselves last.

Read article

Operating note

When not to hire a fractional AI officer

Every page selling this role has a section on when to hire one. None of them has an honest section on when not to. Six situations where the model fails, and what to buy instead, with the prices.

Read article

Operating note

The week-one plan template

Every provider promises a 30-60-90 day plan and most of them hand it over in month two, by which point you have already paid for it. Here is the whole template, the twelve lines it has to contain, and the scorecard to mark it against.

Read article

FAQ

Questions before you start

What does a fractional Chief AI Officer own?

We own the operating decisions around AI: strategy, priorities, governance, vendors, adoption, measurement, and the connection between the roadmap and delivery.

Who is AgentClaw for?

We work with non-software companies that have no employee writing software, firmware, or embedded code, operate in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, or New Zealand, and have a matching investment.

Who is not a fit?

A company is not a fit if it sells software, employs an internal software, firmware, or embedded-code writer, operates outside the serviceable countries, has no matching investment, or needs rip-and-replace work.

What is the difference between CAIO Core and CAIO + Delivery?

CAIO Core starts at $5,000/month and provides ongoing executive AI ownership. CAIO + Delivery starts at $10,000/month and adds an ongoing delivery pod with one active build stream at a time.

Do we need to hire an internal software team first?

No. This service is specifically for a non-software company without an in-house software team. An outsourced development partner does not by itself make the company ineligible.

What happens in the free AI ownership assessment?

The six-question assessment checks company model, internal builders, geography, engagement need, investment, and current AI state. CAIO-qualified companies can continue to an ownership-fit working session. It is not a free full roadmap or week-long audit.

Next decision

Give AI a clear owner

Answer six questions about your company, internal builders, geography, engagement, investment, and current AI state. We will route you to the appropriate next step without collecting contact details from resource-only visitors.

Start the free AI ownership assessment